This House would ban the use of Digital Rights Management technologies

This House would ban the use of Digital Rights Management technologies

Digital Rights Management (DRM) is a kind of technology, normally software-based, that is used to prevent unauthorised copying of digital media, usually by restricting the context in which that media can be used. For example, only allowing music to be played on one particular portable player.

DRM is most often used to protect music, films, and computer software. Some examples of DRM usage are music purchased from Apple’s iTunes store (which are linked to an iTunes account), films on DVDs (which are scrambled), and the online activation found in Microsoft’s Windows operating system (copies of the software must be activated).

Since DRM is used to protect digital media, often purchased over the internet, it is common in many countries.  US and EU legislation enforces the provisions of the 1996 World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Copyright Treaty. Both the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)(1998) and the EU Copyright directive (2001) protect DRM technologies in addition to making simple piracy illegal by prohibiting technologies which circumvent DRM protection.

Some people believe that DRM is not the most effective way protect digital media. This discussion covers arguments for and against DRM usage in at least some instances.

Bibliography

“Enterprise Act 2002.” legislation.gov.uk. 7th November 2002. 

Arthur, Charles. “YouTube fights off $1bn lawsuit from Viacom.” guardian.co.uk. 23rd June 2010. 

“Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.” EUR-Lex. 22nd May 2001.

Edgecliffe-Johnson, Andrew. “Anti-piracy moves 'hurt sales'.” The Financial Times. 20th November 2007. 

Ferguson, Niels. “Censorship in action: why I don't publish my HDCP results.” MacFergus. 15Th August 2001. 

Kingsley-Hughes, Adrian. “UPDATE x2: Avatar Blu-ray DRM bites legitimate customers.” ZDNet. 30th April 2010. 

Lefkow, Chris. “Value of pirated software nearly $59 billion.” Physorg.com. 12th May 2011.

Masnick, Mike. “Ubisoft's Annoying New DRM Cracked Within Hours Of Release.” Techdirt. 4th March 2010. 

Noyes, Katherine. “Jobs' DRM Plea – a Win-Win for Apple.” TechNewsWorld. 14th February 2007. 

“Treaty Of Amsterdam Amending The Treaty On European Union, The Treaties Establishing The European Communities And Related Acts.” OPOCE. 10th November 1997. 

The UK Copright Service. “P-09: Copyright Law | Fair Use conditions.” UKCS. 5th July 2004. 

Time Magazine. “Goodbye Beta: Sony will make VHS players.” Time Magazine. 25th January 1988. 

US Government. “The Digital Millenium Copyright Act of 1998.” U.S. Copyright Office. 28th October 1998. 

Wagner, David. “DRM threatens 'fair use' rights.” ZDNet. 7th March 2006. 

WIPO. “WIPO Copyright Treaty.” wipo.int. 20th December 1996. 

World Trade Organization. “WTO | Intellectual Property (TRIPS).” wto.org. 2011. 

Yang, J. “Why 'Friday' just might be the future of pop.” SFGate. 21st April 2011. 

Zittrain, J. “China and Internet Filters.” Neiman Reports (Neiman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University). Summer 2004. 

Have a good for or against point on this topic? Share it with us!

Login or register in order to submit your arguments
Login
Share Points For or Against Image
Loading...